Wednesday, September 11, 2013

MINNESOTA BREAST CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE


Dr. Joseph Rucker, has been selected to be a keynote speaker at the 12th Annual BCAA Education Conference in Minneapolis, MN on October 12th. 

He will be speaking on "Staying Abreast: Innovations in Plastic Surgery".

Tickets are available for purchase at www.bcaamn.org.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Monday, June 10, 2013

The Future of Breast Augmentation.


Silicone or saline? That is the question that many women on the market for a breast augmentation face. When weighing the options, there have always been strong arguments for both sides. Thanks to new technology, the future of breast augmentation is here with a new implant that has the best of both worlds.

Up until five years ago, the salt water filled implant (saline) has been the preferred implant. The standard silicone implant has since returned to favor, but there has always been that lingering doubt of what happens if it leaks. 


Saline Implant Benefits:
  • Non-toxic in the event of leakage since it is filled with salt water.
  • Size can be varied by merely adding more fluid to enlarge it.
Saline Implant Drawbacks:
  • Does not feel natural.
  • Tends to reveal itself more by producing ridges on the breast.
  • Higher chance of leakage.
Over the past five years, many of my patients have chosen the silicone-filled implant because it does feel much more natural, and it tends to not show the ridges beneath the skin that the saline implant does. Nonetheless, it still causes some concerns if there was leakage, and the silicone was to leak into the breast tissue.

Currently, I feel the saline-filled implant and the standard silicone gel filled implants will be obsolete within the next two years. This is due to the current availability of the revolutionary high tension, gel implant – AKA the “Gummy Bear” implant. The term is coined from the fact that when cut in half, the breast implants are able to retain their shape with no leakage, similar to the popular gummy bear candies.

The benefits of the “Gummy Bear” implant are so pronounced that it has become my implant of choice.


"Gummy Bear" Implant BENEFITS: 
• Smaller chance of a leakage of gel into the body if a rupture is to occur.
• Natural feel, similar to the gel-filled implant.
• Multiple shapes and sizes offered.
• Cost is very comparable to the standard gel-filled implant.
• Some studies suggest that there may be less of a chance of scarring around the Sientra “Gummy Bear” implant.


With these suggestions and information in mind, it is important to remember that a consult with your plastic surgeon is highly recommended to determine your personalized needs. For more information or to set up an appointment, please call 715.833.1068 and speak to our patient coordinator.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

It's here! PROFILES Summer 2013!

Check out the latest issue of PROFILES magazine to read up on:
  • The Future of Breast Augmentation by Joseph Rucker, MD, FACS
  • Benefits of Stem Cells in your Skin Care Regimen
  • Menopause & You by Donna Schoenfelder, MD
  • Help! I have ACNE SCARRING
  • Group Workouts You Will LOVE by Lori Heck, ASPIRE Personal Training
  • Feed Your Skin! by Tammy Schofield, MS, RD
  • The Enza Medispa summer specials!

Friday, May 3, 2013

Mastectomy and Immediate Single-Staged Skin-Sparing Breast Reconstruction

A Breast Cancer diagnosis is devastating and the idea of a mastectomy is often just as difficult to accept. While your primary goal is to rid your body of cancer, it can be hard to imagine ever getting back to feeling “whole” again. Part of a complete recovery is restoring confidence in how you look and feel.
Dr. Joseph Rucker performs the new skin-sparing, single-stage mastectomy and immediate reconstruction which preserves, in some cases, the nipple and areola as well as the breast skin. 

The benefits of this technique are:
  • One surgical procedure for both the mastectomy and reconstruction.
  • One recovery.
  • Patient's skin envelope is preserved.
  • Usually only one overnight hospital stay required.
  • No increased risk of recurrence.
  • Better cosmetic result after reconstruction.
The Procedure: On the surface, your natural breasts are preserved. Inside, your tissue is completely replaced with an implant. This state of the art procedure involves the cooperation of a cancer surgeon and Dr. Rucker acting as a team, along with your oncologist. 

Until now, mastectomies involved flaps, expanders, tattoos and scars. Skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy offers an option that is less severe and more cosmetic. By retaining the shell of your natural breasts and using an implant, the results often resemble a breast augmentation rather than a reconstruction.

Insurance Coverage: Single or double mastectomy? A federal law was passed in 1998 requiring all health insurance companies to cover reconstruction of the breast on which mastectomy has been performed. Additionally, it covers surgery and reconstruction of the other breast to produce a symmetrical appearance.  Because of this, women with a higher risk of developing breast cancer, and who formerly might have considered a single mastectomy now elect to have both breasts removed and reconstructed.

Risk of Recurrence: Skin-sparing mastectomy has been advocated as an oncologically safe approach for the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer that minimizes deformity and improves cosmesis through preservation of the skin envelope of the breast. Extensive research has been done regarding this procedure when compared with mastectomies that remove all the tissue, skin and nipples. The result? The new skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy in no way contributes to recurrence. In addition, careful review of scientific research over 20 years found no proven link between breast implants and auto immune or other systemic diseases, nor do they inhibit future cancer detection.

Candidates for Procedure: Many, but not all, patients are candidates for a skin-sparing mastectomy. Your choices may be limited by your pathology or prior surgeries. However, this new option has made women with the BRAC gene and those at high risk for breast cancer consider a skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy prophylactically - removing the tissue as a potential target. Others considering lumpectomy, which can be disfiguring, can now confidently opt for removal of all tissue while preserving and enhancing their natural breasts. These patients leave the hospital not only with their shape and contour intact, but the gift of peace of mind, knowing that all of the breast tissue has been removed.

Philosophy: Dr. Joseph Rucker, a board certified plastic surgeon with advanced training in breast reconstruction techniques, approaches reconstruction no differently than an elective cosmetic procedure. His keen aesthetic sense makes his goal to leave every woman looking even better than before their unfortunate diagnosis. Working closely with a cancer surgeon and your oncologist, Dr. Rucker will help determine if you are a candidate, considering your individual treatment plan and overall health.  

To view a short video on this subject go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUXv2RWny6A.

40 year old female with advanced premalignant breast disease and also with a strong family history for Breast Cancer. She requested bilateral mastectomies and immediate single-stage bilateral breast reconstruction.
1 month after bilateral skin and nipple-sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction.



Thursday, April 18, 2013

Doctor, What Size and Type of Implant would you Recommend?


When choosing a breast implant, there are two major factors one must consider (1) what size implant is best for me and (2) what type of implant should I choose. The following information is meant to guide you in making an educated decision

IMPLANT SIZE: While there is no specific chart that will display exactly what size implant should be used, most surgeons will have a general suggestion for each of their patients. The surgeon must make a determination based on the cup size that the patient desires as well as the body size of the patient. Generally I offer the suggestions listed below:
  • Small statured women (<5'3") with an A cup requesting a C cup. My implant range suggestions are between 280cc to 380cc
  • Medium statured women (>5'3") with an A cup requesting a C+ cup size. My implant range suggestion is between 380cc and 480cc
  • Large statured women (>5'8") with an A cup requesting a C+ cup to a D cup. My implant range is between 480cc and 540cc
IMPLANT TYPE: When it comes to implant type, I personally think the saline filled implant and the standard silicone gel filled implants will be obsolete within the next two years. This is due to the many benefits of the revolutionary Sientra "Gummy Bear" Implant. The benefits of the Sientra implant are so pronounced that it has become my implant of choice due to the following reasons:

  • There is a smaller chance of a leakage of gel into the body if a rupture is to occur
  • Has a natural feel similar to the gel filled implant
  • There are multiple shapes and sizes offered
  • The cost is very comparable to the standard gel filled implant
  • Some studies suggest that there may be less of a chance of scarring around the Sientra implant

With these suggestions and information in mind, it is important to remember that a consult with your plastic surgeon is highly recommended to determine your personalized needs. For more information or to set up an appointment for a consultation with Dr. Rucker, please call our offices: 715-832-1774. All inquiries are welcome and can be answered by an experienced Rucker MD staff.